Managing Credit Risk by Counterparty Selection

Request a Copy

In cases where counterparties, e.g. prime brokers, do not post collateral and CDS protection is prohibitively expensive, hedge funds tend to manage credit risk through counterparty selection. This typically entails choosing the counterparty with the lowest aggregate current exposure (mark-to-market value) for the next OTC transaction. The problem with this approach is that it doesn’t take into account the potential level of current exposure on future dates.

Hedge funds that manage credit risk by selecting counterparties with the lowest current exposure are not necessarily minimizing counterparty risk. Depending on the composition of the portfolio and underlying risk factors, a new transaction may add substantial exposure to a portfolio even if its current exposure is relatively low. This whitepaper will step through an example where choosing a counterparty with lower current exposure can result in greater counterparty risk.



Recommended Whitepapers and Articles

Banks Are Not Ready for Counterparty Risk Elements of Basel lll

Optimising Capital Requirements for Counterparty Credit Risk

How the Credit Crisis Has Changed Counterparty Risk Management

The Evolution of Counterparty Credit Risk


Request a Copy